Julius Caesar Essay

Conflicting perspectives, What are they? Conflicting perspectives are a clash of ideologies and belief systems. When studying at odds(p) perspectives we are suitable to open diverse and provocative insights, like the idea that is likable to an listenings system of logic and reason is less effective in persuading them as opposed to appealing to their emotions which is more effective. This can be guessn through the texts Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare, the article Arguwork forcets Agown(prenominal)st stillbirth by Kerby Anderson and the essay spontaneous spontaneous abortion and the Alternatives by Voula Papas.In the text Julius caesar conflicting perspectives can be seen in act 3 scene 1 where both Brutus and Antony give speeches ab start caesars death. In Brutuss speech he expenditures a number of rhetorical features and logic to convince the Plebeians that the killing of Caesar was carried out for the goodness of rome. we can see this through the Had you rather Ca esar were animate and die all slaves, than that Caesar were dead and live all free men? .The use of truism in this quote makes the audience unable to adjure a contradicting point of view thus they are forced into complying with Brutuss thoughts. Brutuss speech is delivered in prose, a slightly unpolished and ingenuous manhoodner of speaking. The use of prose in this instance appeals to the audience as they are able to directly relate to this manner of speaking, being of a somewhat lower class, thus allowing Brutus to connect with them on a higher level.He also arouses patriotism and plays on the rights to civil freedom of the audience to call further glib-tonguedness to his speech. He does this by inferring logical and restrained conclude for Caesars death which appeals to the audiences intelligence and commonsense. The high mode of the rhetorical question Who is here so vile that will non love his country? is extremely powerful in agitating the existing devotion the audi ence has towards Rome.Similarly in the essay Arguments against Abortion the author, uses rhetorical devices and the use of logic (logos) to convince the audience that abortion is wrong. The essay has been ordered in four subsections biblical, medical, legal and philosophical arguments against abortion. Exemplification techniques through the use of facts and statistics is utilize to emphasize the point that author is trying to make.The author uses some(prenominal) logos techniques very effectively, often to make a point or so the fetus being alive and being able to feel ain even at very early stages of life, so should not be destroyed. An example of this is seen in the line If heartbeat was used to define life, indeed nearly all abortions would be outlawed the deductive reasoning used makes conclusions about the fact that life exist even as a fetus and thus abortion is actually death of the fetus. By stock Antony from Julius caesar heavily relies upon the power of talking to an d its ability to exploit the human brand that is emotion, and by doing so manipulate ones perception through a emotionally (pathos) driven argument.Antony has a greater understanding of the people and knows that they are torrid people who will be s representationed by such talk. Also Antony unlike Brutus uses iambic pentameter this shows that he has a higher authority which would make the audience listen more carefully. After each argument Antony produces in Caesars defense, he uses irony through the lines But Brutus says he was ambitious, and Brutus is an honorable man. This line is repeated a number of times creating an anaphora.As salubrious as slowly dismantling Brutus reputation through the irony, Antony indirectly implies and focuses the blessed upon him and plays to the emotions of his audience indulging them to question their newly acquired perspective. It is Antonys use of emotional language that allows him to persuade his audience more than Brutus. Like wise the artic le Abortion and the Alternatives by Kerby Anderson relies on the use of emotive language to convince the readers that abortion can sometimes be the only resort for a female.The persuasive technique of pathos is used to effectively convey to the reader wherefore the choice should be with the women, reference to rape nationals and quilt feeling by women after abortion are examples of this. This appeals to the human nature of the reader and weakens them emotionally making it easier for them to be swayed. Also the use of props In this case a graphic exposure of a woman, bloodied towel in fist, crouched, new and dead of a botched abortion.The vivid imagery allows the audience to see in reality what it is like and makes them more inclined to believe and hold to what the author is suggesting. The rhetorical question Before legal abortion.. do you want to go back to this? as a caption of the image conveys a powerful message that there is an alternative which is safe, legal and handy and that is abortion. We can see through all the three texts that conflicting perspectives generate provocative insights that are appealing to the audiences emotions is a more effective way of persuading them than appealing to their logic.