'Case About Anthony Tan\r'

'Concise Summary of Case †Anthony tangent was one of the most wanted workforce as he was supposedly aerated for make of Bosnian refugee and Rebels bikie, Edin â€Å"Boz” Smajovic. After 2 years building an export strain in Vietnam, he read a media report from NSW, describing him as one of the relegate’s most wanted men. He was unaware for 2 years of the natural law hunt for him. He immediately got on the phone, first his lawyer, then to an airline. He was more than willing to return to Australia to fight his all in allegations.In the balance he was arrested and charged for the murder and held on remand in prison for everyplace a year. When he granted trammel in August, his trial was to start that alike(p) week. Both Anthony Tan and co-accused Nathan Keith Reddy and taken to court. at once the subject reached the ultimate cost, the chemise was brush aside level before the trial had started. This was because, it was mum that the parapraxis faile d partly collectible to an alleged exculpation from a prosecution witness. Jurisdictions of all courts involved â€The two courts involved in this episode were the Central local anaesthetic homage and the Supreme tribunal. The jurisdictions for the local court imply the majority of miserable, summary prosecutions in NSW and with civil matters up to $100,000. It in each upshot conducts committal minutes to determine whether or not chargeable offences are to be commit to the rule and Supreme Court. Meanwhile the jurisdictions for the Supreme Court has unlimited civil jurisdictions and handles claims of more than $750,000. It also deals with the most serious distressing matters, including murder and treason.The initial court for this case (Central Local Court) had refused bail, scarcely when it reached the Supreme Court, the case was dismissed even before the trail had even started. Area of law †The Anthony Tan case was a unrestricted, criminal case, as Anthony allegedly broke the criminal law, which is part of the human race law (also known as the putting surface law). The standard of test copy is the amount of severalise which a plaintiff or prosecuting attorney, in a criminal case, must be presented in a trial in order to win.As for a civil case the standard of proof is broadly speaking that the plaintiff must prove this case by majority (51%) of the evidence. The standard of proof for this case was it was beyond reasonable doubt. The standard of proof needed for a criminal case is that at that place must be no reasonable doubt that the defendant committed the crime in order to inpatient the defendant. The standard of proof in this criminal case, which resulted in the freedom of Mr. Tan, was an alleged confession from a prosecution witness, which led to the case to fail.Was a panel used? why or why not? †A jury is usually used in the Supreme Court, but the Supreme Court judge had dismissed the case on technical terms, there fore a jury was not needed. It was an interesting case due to the fact that Tan was innocent barely held in jail for more than 1 year. This had a major impact on Anthony Tan’s life, reputation and his future. For a case that would of continued in the Supreme Court, a jury would adjudge been selected, but due to the fact that the case was dismissed, a jury was not needed.Is a jury effective? †A jury is a group of citizens (usually of 12) who hears the testimony in judicial disputes and determines what they believe is the truth. The word jury is derived from the French word jurer, which means, â€Å"to swear an oath. ” The jury has generally been successful because their peers judge the accused and the public plays a role in the criminal justice system, as they make the participation feel as though they have a voice in situations that job golf-club at large.The jury is there to represent a cross-section of society and they provide a range of perceptions. simi larly the responsibility for the verdict is spread across 12 jurors and the system acts as a safety net against corrupt and autocratic conduct by state and/or police force. The jury is also conservatively selected to avoid bias, prejudice, racist, sexist or any other form of discrimination, which can sour the verdict. Also the defense council can finish off a juror, if they feel uncomfortable with them organism in the jury.\r\n'