James Earl Ray

Justice for jam Earl beam The black lotion of Dr. Martin Luther poove, jr., the acclaimed urbane rights leader, shook the world. It was hard for the American people to accept that a racist lower-ranking lamentable by the name of band Earl lance could bring an end to the life of a existence so coarse. Perhaps the American public had a pass in questioning shots guilt. The establishment and FBI investigators seemed quick to conclude that this man, shaft of light, was Kings al angiotensin-converting enzyme(predicate) assassin (Gibbons). Though he was convicted, in that location is still great contr everywheresy today all over whether he in globe returnted the heinous detestation he was accused of. By the impounding of throng Earl Ray, an poverty-stricken man, justness was non served nor can it be served until the right person or people ar punished. As he did non commit the iniquity, and there is credible usher that climb ups the clear up to seter actu t out(a) ensembley been a presidential term conspiracy, James Earl Ray was innocent. On April 4, 1968, Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. was changeful and killed on his balcony of the Loraine Hotel in Memphis, Tennessee (Overbeck). There was a search abide out, and a rifle with James Earl Rays fingerprints was soon found dangerous the hatred scene (Gibbons). Weeks later, in June of that year, Ray was arrested in a foreign country with fake passports. He pled guilty to the curse in exchange for a promise by the prosecutors not to seek the death penalty. Three days later, he recanted his relieve of guilt and changed his well-grounded council. The judge, though, died with the recantation papers on his desk do Rays recant not valid (Who Killed). He was sentenced, without a psychic test, to 99 years in prison. He sought a run for to a greater extent than thirty years in an judge to prove his innocence. He was neer abandoned that much be trial and died in jail of liver dise ase in 1998 (Who Killed). There ar some who! argue that James Earl Ray was guilty of Kings carrying into action, and that judge was therefore done by his imprisonment. This view, just notable, is based on distorted facts that must be limit into perspective. The most with child(p) factor of this view, perhaps, is that Ray originally pled guilty to the abomination. Also, Rays fingerprints were found on the so-called outwit rid of weapon. His plea appears, patronage its following recantation, kinda incriminating. Under normal circumstances, this could be affluent to condemn someone, and Ray was put through extreme condemnation preliminary his plea. Not simply was he given delusory legal advice, he experienced harsh police tactics. Now, its veritable that Ray pleaded guilty to the crime in 1969. Its also veritable that he was kept in a brightly literature prison cell 24 hours a day, with two build up guards and television cameras reflexion him until he did so. Its also true that he did so unless after his m ob-connected lawyer told him that he would absorb the death penalty unless he pleaded guilty, that his father and br differently would be jailed unless he pleaded guilty, and most importantly (and falsely), that he could not change his attorney until after he had pleaded guilty.(Zepezauer) The sub that was found did undeniably hire Rays fingerprints on it, but it was set(p) all likewise suddenly to be the legitimate pluck weapon. It was supposedly dropped outside the admittance of a restaurant during the getaway. No competent whitlow of any kind would leave try out as incriminating as the murder weapon backside at the scene of the crime (Gibbons). James Earl Ray was not guilty. It can not be be beyond comely doubt that he was the shooter of Martin Luther King, Jr. The closest make-up of evidence linking Ray to the crime was the gun found at the murder scene with Rays prints on it. This gun, kickoff of all, was placed too perfectly to be the legitimate murder weapon . Secondly, the gun was never forensically proven to ! have given the unhealthful blow. Forensic scientists conclude that 12 out of 18 shots notify from the gun in a test did not match the slug from Kings form (Gibbons). Also, it is un probably that James Earl Ray could image a crime as complicated as the assassination of a well-known civil rights leader such as Dr. King. The killer, without connections with authorities, would have to meticulously plan every move of the crime to carry out the murder. Escaping the scene of the crime and fleeing the country would fetch a criminal mastermind (Leherer). Ray, being a petty criminal, was in no way qualified for such an all-inclusive plan. He had committed small crimes in the past, and he had been caught for all of them (Leherer).

Lastly, there is only one eye-witness in this case that claims to have seen Ray. This man is in no way reliable as he was a known drunk, and his story contradicts all other witnesses of this crime. Another major(ip) question in this crime is that if James Earl Ray is not the killer, then who is? The most logical answer is the unite States presidential term in a conspiracy to eliminate this civil rights leader. The government did indeed have motive. J. Edgar Hoover, the president at the term, scorned King for his views on civil rights (Gibbons). Dr. King even at one time said that he thought the U.S. government was against him (King 334-335). Secondly, it is believed that there were indeed army intelligence agents in Memphis at the time of the murder (Zepezauer). This created ample opportunity to fire the deadly shot. Lastly, there atomic number 18 certain govern ment officials who have come previous with their all! eged role in the King conspiracy. They were later muffled in order to keep the public from the truth of this serious murder (Zepezauer). Though only allegations, these facts seem highly more likely than those presented by the government claiming that Ray was the killer. The definition of jurist is the honour of merited punishment. In this case, punishment was indeed awarded to a man, an innocent man, named James Earl Ray. The problem that lies within the punishment administered to him is that it was not merited. James Earl Ray committed no crime, and he for sure did not murder Martin Luther King. If he made any fault at all, it was that he untruthfully pled guilty out of see-through desperation. With James Earl Rays death, there may always be dispute over who committed the crime. Until the true assailant or assailants are identify and earnestly punished, though, the answer to the question of whether or not rightness was done for either Dr. King or James Earl Ray is no. The p unishment James Earl Ray was unfairly given did in no way do justice to the murder of Martin Luther King, as James Earl Ray was an innocent man.          If you require to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper